Filthy 50

For time:
50 Box jump, 24 inch box
50 Jumping pull-ups
50 Kettlebell swings, 1 pood
Walking Lunge, 50 steps
50 Knees to elbows
50 Push press, 45 pounds
50 Back extensions
50 Wall ball shots, 20 pound ball
50 Burpees
50 Double unders

Post time to comments.

Wednesday WOD, 1/27/10

12 thoughts on “Wednesday WOD, 1/27/10

  • January 26, 2010 at 10:00 pm

    My comment was simply going to be “No” but when I clicked on “leave a comment” I was informed that my “comment was a bit too short. Go back and try again.”

  • January 27, 2010 at 7:31 am

    30 instead of 50 reps – 19:03 – no walking lunges (was left off the board) – knees to elbows were the worst for me

  • January 27, 2010 at 7:33 am

    Dirty Thirty: 28 minutes
    Whoever made this WOD is a jerk.

  • January 27, 2010 at 7:40 am

    Dirty 30 14:57. Wall balls sucked. A speedy recovery to Newley and good luck to Paukune who is having shoulder surgery on Friday. What is happening to all the Roosters???? Old age I guess….

  • January 27, 2010 at 8:30 am

    Staging my return today. Read into that whatever you like.

  • January 27, 2010 at 8:41 am

    Returning on Filthy 50 day? What’s wrong with you?

  • January 27, 2010 at 1:46 pm

    I was going to do dirty dozen but if we doing the filthy fifty I’m down!

  • January 27, 2010 at 2:27 pm

    With wife just KO’d the idea. Oh well. Maybe Friday.

    But to answer your question, I was probably just going to do the 30’s since I have been a couch potato for the last month.

  • January 27, 2010 at 2:28 pm

    “With” should read “My”

  • January 27, 2010 at 3:43 pm

    And it would have if you had pushed the “m” and then the “y” keys.

    I was either going to say that or comment on your wife pushing you around. I couldn’t really decide which way to go.

  • January 27, 2010 at 5:16 pm

    27 and change. As rx’d.

  • January 27, 2010 at 8:57 pm

    31 as rx’d, except for screwing up the back extensions.

    K about a minute faster half 30s half 50s.

    Also why are burpees so awful? There are no publications on this in Web of Science. Field is wide open.

Comments are closed.